Zuckerberg and many like him in America, they may call themselves Democrats, Leftists, Libertarians, however their ideal system is a World which looks like the caliphates of the Middle Ages.
There will be different people of a book, along as one can be classified. Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Stalinists, Fascists, Anarchists, Nationalsocialists etc. However no one will be allowed to exist outside a group. One must have a holy book, have an ideal Jerusalem, an ideal Kingdom to come and submit to inspired authorities. One must live by the rules of his community and submit fully to them.
As leading group, the Protestants will provide the general framework.
There will be tensions between the groups, so that the leading group may use it as a pretext to interfere and people will have enemies to fear, so they will be loyal to their leaders and fellows.
No freedom of choise, as everything will be "alternativeless".
No freedom of speech, as every word will hurt somebody's feelings.
There will be freedom of thought, only as long as they won't be expressed in any form.
Zuckerberg's algorithms seem to protect the claims of the groups over the opinion of individuals. If a group-of-a-book is complaining, then the individuals are wrong and must be punished, even if the members of the group swear and the individuals reply with facts and logic.
There will be different people of a book, along as one can be classified. Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Stalinists, Fascists, Anarchists, Nationalsocialists etc. However no one will be allowed to exist outside a group. One must have a holy book, have an ideal Jerusalem, an ideal Kingdom to come and submit to inspired authorities. One must live by the rules of his community and submit fully to them.
As leading group, the Protestants will provide the general framework.
There will be tensions between the groups, so that the leading group may use it as a pretext to interfere and people will have enemies to fear, so they will be loyal to their leaders and fellows.
No freedom of choise, as everything will be "alternativeless".
No freedom of speech, as every word will hurt somebody's feelings.
There will be freedom of thought, only as long as they won't be expressed in any form.
Zuckerberg's algorithms seem to protect the claims of the groups over the opinion of individuals. If a group-of-a-book is complaining, then the individuals are wrong and must be punished, even if the members of the group swear and the individuals reply with facts and logic.
