Πέμπτη 26 Ιανουαρίου 2017

Finance against Business

Banks shouldn't belong to a state or private institutions, but to the people trading. The very existence of external moneymakers and creditors is arrogation of the whole trade. Banks shouldn't be anything more than another public service providing the paper or the data for the trade partners. However they managed to appropriate the whole trade as they own the money needed for the whole trading system. As they ask for interest the whole trade volume should increase every year. However in nature there is no eternal growth, but after a peak there is glut or decline. Finance is used to overcome this glut by fictive goods, which provide gain to finance by business decline. Worst of all why should anybody try to make money out of the goods and services market, when the real money is in the finance instruments with no costs and no real product development? There are giant corporations which were found before the rise of finance, but there so going to be a shift sooner or later.

Article about the Rise of Finance and the Fall of American Business

Τρίτη 24 Ιανουαρίου 2017

Donald Trump vs. George Soros

I am not much interested in elections, because parlementary democracy is no democracy to me and politicians act as if they appeal to morons and most probably that is what they think of their voters. However I have a strongest dislike against any type of parabalani and so not only against Brownshirts, Blackshirts or Redshirts but Pinkshirts or pink Pussyhats as well. Pink Pussyhats are probably a mocking of the Phrygian Cap, the symbol of the American and French Revolution.
So Trump, probably a useful idiot, won the elections in his country and the opponent George Soros, or at least this is the person we see or is easy to detect, will try to bring him down. Soros will use toilet papers in his possession like The Guardian to make a fuss about Trump talking like a rockstar, but will not do anything about a real problem like a refuge closing in Sunderland, except writing an article one is going to forget the next moment.
Common people shouldn't get any ideas that they might find a leader who really would support them against the rich people, for everyone sake even for the rich's.

Source


Identity politics
Billionaire George Soros has ties to more than 50 ‘partners’ of the Women’s March on Washington
What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the Women’s March? Turns out, it’s quite significant

ASRA Q. NOMANI01.20.17
 Billionaire investor George Soros. (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images)
BILLIONAIRE INVESTOR GEORGE SOROS. (PHOTO BY SEAN GALLUP/GETTY IMAGES)
In the pre-dawn darkness of today’s presidential inauguration day, I faced a choice, as a lifelong liberal feminist who voted for Donald Trump for president: lace up my pink Nike sneakers to step forward and take the DC Metro into the nation’s capital for the inauguration of America’s new president, or wait and go tomorrow to the after-party, dubbed the “Women’s March on Washington”?

 The Guardian has touted the “Women’s March on Washington” as a “spontaneous” action for women’s rights. Another liberal media outlet, Vox, talks about the “huge, spontaneous groundswell” behind the march. On its website, organizers of the march are promoting their work as “a grassroots effort” with “independent” organizers. Even my local yoga studio, Beloved Yoga, is renting a bus and offering seats for $35. The march’s manifesto says magnificently, “The Rise of the Woman = The Rise of the Nation.”

It’s an idea that I, a liberal feminist, would embrace. But I know — and most of America knows — that the organizers of the march haven’t put into their manifesto: the march really isn’t a “women’s march.” It’s a march for women who are anti-Trump.

As someone who voted for Trump, I don’t feel welcome, nor do many other women who reject the liberal identity-politics that is the core underpinnings of the march, so far, making white women feel unwelcome, nixing women who oppose abortion and hijacking the agenda.

To understand the march better, I stayed up through the nights this week, studying the funding, politics and talking points of the some 403 groups that are “partners” of the march. Is this a non-partisan “Women’s March”?

Roy Speckhardt, executive director of the American Humanist Association, a march “partner,” told me his organization was “nonpartisan” but has “many concerns about the incoming Trump administration that include what we see as a misogynist approach to women.” Nick Fish, national program director of the American Atheists, another march partner, told me, “This is not a ‘partisan’ event.” Dennis Wiley, pastor of Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, another march “partner,” returned my call and said, “This is not a partisan march.”

Really? UnitedWomen.org, another partner, features videos with the hashtags #ImWithHer, #DemsInPhily and #ThanksObama. Following the money, I poured through documents of billionaire George Soros and his Open Society philanthropy, because I wondered: What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the “Women’s March”?

I found out: plenty.

By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment. 

On the issues I care about as a Muslim, the “Women’s March,” unfortunately, has taken a stand on the side of partisan politics that has obfuscated the issues of Islamic extremism over the eight years of the Obama administration. “Women’s March” partners include the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has not only deflected on issues of Islamic extremism post-9/11, but opposes Muslim reforms that would allow women to be prayer leaders and pray in the front of mosques, without wearing headscarves as symbols of chastity. Partners also include the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which wrongly designated Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim reformer, an “anti-Muslim extremist” in a biased report released before the election. The SPLC confirmed to me that Soros funded its “anti-Muslim extremists” report targeting Nawaz. (Ironically, CAIR also opposes abortions, but its leader still has a key speaking role.)

Another Soros grantee and march “partner” is the Arab-American Association of New York, whose executive director, Linda Sarsour, is a march co-chair. When I co-wrote a piece, arguing that Muslim women don’t have to wear headscarves as a symbol of “modesty,” she attacked the coauthor and me as “fringe.”

Earlier, at least 33 of the 100 “women of color,” who initially protested the Trump election in street protests, worked at organizations that receive Soros funding, in part for “black-brown” activism. Of course, Soros is an “ideological philanthropist,” whose interests align with many of these groups, but he is also a significant political donor. In Davos, he told reporters that Trump is a “would-be dictator.”

A spokeswoman for Soros’s Open Society Foundations, said in a statement, “There have been many false reports about George Soros and the Open Society Foundations funding protests in the wake of the U.S. presidential elections. There is no truth to these reports.” She added, “We support a wide range of organizations — including those that support women and minorities who have historically been denied equal rights. Many of whom are concerned about what policy changes may lie ahead. We are proud of their work. We of course support the right of all Americans to peaceably assemble and petition their government—a vital, and constitutionally safeguarded, pillar of a functioning democracy.”

Much like post-election protests, which included a sign, “Kill Trump,” were not  “spontaneous,” as reported by some media outlets, the “Women’s March” is an extension of strategic identity politics that has so fractured America today, from campuses to communities. On the left or the right, it’s wrong. But, with the inauguration, we know the politics. With the march, “women” have been appropriated for a clearly anti-Trump day. When I shared my thoughts with her, my yoga studio owner said it was “sad” the march’s organizers masked their politics. “I want love for everyone,” she said.

The left’s fierce identity politics and its failure on Islamic extremism lost my vote this past election, and so, as the dawn’s first light breaks through the darkness of the morning as I write, I make my decision: I’ll lace up my pink Nikes and head to the inauguration, skipping the “Women’s March” that doesn’t have a place for women like me.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This story has been updated to include a statement from the Open Society Foundations.

Asra Q. Nomani is a former Wall Street Journal reporter. She can be reached at asra@asranomani.com or on Twitter.

Δευτέρα 16 Ιανουαρίου 2017

Something for amateurs like Microsoft, IBM, Oracle ...

The Greek elites are exasperated with being made responsible for the Greek economic crisis and have decided to make a profound organisation of the Greek economy. So the University of Peloponnese decided to hold a conference, to show people what exactly they should do to trounce the worlds richest enterprises. The solution is when all businessmen pray the The Jesus Prayer!

Article in Greek
Instructions in Greek

Κυριακή 15 Ιανουαρίου 2017

The dawn of the new suzerainty

Capitalism achieved growth through the amelioration of goods and services. However that was until recently, as now the dominant role is played by the financial markets. Financial markets are bet markets and therefore people may win a lot of money, even if the goods and services market shrinks. Growth is now achieved by the financial markets as they produce forty and fifty times the turnover of the goods and services market.

Subtitles in English


Παρασκευή 13 Ιανουαρίου 2017

Greece like Iran or Saudi Arabia!

It is all in Greek, however one can see the priest entering the place, disrupting the speaker and reproaching the audience. As he said later, his objection was not about the actions of  these particular branch or the people in the headquarters, but that the main person of the whole movement and maybe the people around him are thought to be a pagans. So as long as people say they are Christians, they may promote any nonsense they want. A Heathen will not be tolerated, even if he would be the most competent one of all ages.




Κυριακή 8 Ιανουαρίου 2017

Saint Demeter of Eleusis - Inclusive and Exclusive Religions

Eleusis was the home of the famous in antiquity Eleusinian Mysteries.  The main Goddess of the cult was Demeter. The cult was stopped by Emperor Theodosius as every non Catholic Christian cult, the temple was destroyed by Alarich and his monks and to add on this the last hierophant was a false one, he was a priest of Mithras. However a Caryatid of the demolished site remain above the earth and was venerated as the statue of Saint Demetra. There is a Saint Demetrius who is supposed to have lived in Thessaloniki, but no-one knows a Saint Demetra. Of course Greek Orthodox priests say that for every name there is at least one Saint. No Hellene however called his children after the Gods, so how come there are people who were called after the Gods, became Christians and then martyrs, is difficult to figure out. Anyhow the peasants in Eleusis believed that the statue of Saint Demeter made the soil fertile. The Orthodox Christians never use statues, but icons to depict saints, angels and the trinity of gods.
In 1800 Greece was under Ottoman occupation and an Englishman exchanged the permit of taking it away with him, with a telescope as a gift to the Ottoman governor of Athens. The abbot of a monastery in Salamis which had Eleusis under his jurisdiction at that time gave his consent as well. He had just to say that the cult was Heathen and not Christian and the people of Eleusis would have to either give in or loose they heads, as only Jews and Christians are tolerated by Islam. 
However no matter how exclusive Christianity is, the article still talks about sculptures venerated by people of two different religions. Caryatids were no cult statues and how Christian can one be when one is so Heathen in his practices?
If ever a village was found where twelve saints or more would be venerated who were called after the Hellenic Gods, would theys still speak about Orthodox Christians and the transition of Hellenism to Christianity, or would they then think of Cryptohellenes?

Article in Greek

Κυριακή 1 Ιανουαρίου 2017

Christians and Marxists won't let them lose Islam!

Christianity and Islam are no traditions so they aren't and cannot be part of an identity. They both destroyed ethnic identities, but they never could eradicate them or form a new one. Identities cannot be formed in the halls of the palaces by authorities, because it is not in the nature of people to accept them. Those two have only created problems and solved none. People where forced to pretend to believe some doctrines, no-one could really understand or philosophise about them. So when regimes are forced to be something less than totalitarian, people loose their identity, because usually they don't know their real one. Many elements were taken from the native religions in order to make convertion easier and together with the basic doctrines, some variations were formed. Real traditions, however, adapt to changes normally, monotheistic variations cannot absorp anything new. So we have people who reject the doctrines, think that the monotheistic variation is their tradition, but their soul rejects it.
Millenarian political ideologies, as they are the political and ideological equivalent to monotheistic religions, try to force people to remain parts of monotheism, so they can add or replace the monotheistic elements. Communists and Anarchists want to go back to the time, where monotheism was about to seize power, without thinking that it will lead exactly to where it lead centuries ago, and what happened with communistic countries as well. The other side knows what happened and yearn for imperial times, thinking they will be the gentry and not the serfs.
The article underneath from 'The Guardian' and is about Britain's Muslims who lose their faith.

Source