1968 the year that changed everything but nothing became better!

1968 is a year where the young people revolted against the christian establishment of the West. That was good because christianity has nothing to offer to broad masses or elites. Christianity was formed by the poor and the weak for the poor and weak. Christianity became the state religion of the Roman Empire in order to unite the most antisocial, unsocial and asocial people of the empire, who survived the three pandemics of 160,180 and 250 CE and became if not the majority, a significant role player.
Since then the world cannot get rid of that religion or world view, because it is practical for the vicious elites and the ignorant majority.
The problem is that that movement was probably initiated by the communists and if not, they managed to lead it. However communism was never interested to have a better society for the West, but to undermine it, in order to cause a revolution which would solve all problems as they thought had happened in the USSR.
These people of the 1968 maintained their weird ideas and passed it down to their children. Actually because they didn't know anything, they did the exact opposite of what their parents did to them. They left their children without discipline or virtues, they didn't educate them, they just told them to study arts and learn how to express their ignorance with scholar definitions.
Since then newspapers and magazines are full of articles of people who have learned to talk or to write without saying anything! Of hysterical people who don't know anything, but they think they know everything, who think they are genius, but are dumb!
And that because the revolutioners had no adequate theoretical background, as marxism isn't anything that can be taken seriously!

What can we do about climate change? Nothing!

Are humans serious? They want to stop climate change? Then let them pray to the Sun to stop sending more heat to the universe.
Well the pseudo-elites with heaven and hell in their minds, and pure evil against pure good, probably think it is a good idea to keep the world together against an imaginary threat. They may think it is also a good idea to let the industry be destroyed, to stop producing goods, to stop doing research and say that this has to be done in order to maintain life upon the earth and not due to the total incompetence of the elites. It is a good trick to enforce feudality upon humanity again, where 2% will have many goods and will keep eating veal and pork and drink milk whatever they want and the rest will have to grass literally.
Climate has been changing and will be changing as long as earth exists, has happened without humans upon the earth and will be happening either with humanity upon her or not.
Maybe it is the right moment for the nuclear lobby to bring nuclear energy back. After Fukushima Merkel for example, the one who became a doctorate for doing always the opposite of what she first intended, after having prolongued the contracts of nuclear energy plants, she decided to phaseout from nuclear energy. Well Germany will have to pay a lot of insurance money, unless they go back to nuclear energy. This could be an example.
The activists either knowing it or not will have solutions which will be in the end the equivalent of the whole humanity to go back to the jungle and because this is impossible and ridiculous, one will have to say yes to nuclear energy!

Keep your 'ethical' eating for yourselves!

After the vegetarian and vegan hooligans, there are the specialised ones, who have appeared lately. The ones have a special problem with milk, the other with octopodes, the issue with fish has risen up again, cows being methan mines etc.
First of all these articles and programs begin with the appeal to the authority of some scientists. Well scientists aren't known for their activism against the establishment. There are always exceptions, but that's the case with scientists as well; very few exceptions.
What makes a scientist an authority for ethical or philosophical issues? Nothing! They may have their own opinion like scholars or artists or athletes or business managers or any other workaholic, but nothing more.
Today scientists have to do research at a topic which is funded, they can't do anything without a lot of money and outside a team. So actually their education is that of a 16 year old, because later they become specialised. The same is with the other elites, however scientists and scholars do the best out of their ten years of general education. Well so called education, actually the gulping of facts. Politicians do their best to obstruct education from schools.
Today's world doesn't want education, but the production of phoney legal money. That is money which doesn't involve direct exchange of goods or services.
However scientints have the same problem with all those pseudo-elites and that is they think they are educated. Probably out of bigotry, they think since they had so much luck in their lifes, they must be the beloved children of the extra-universal God. So they know everything out of enlightenment.
Which is actually the moral authority in the world of today? Marxism? No! Marxism is the only choise in humanistic studies but it is interested only in economy. Abrahamism is!
People may have lost their faith to the Bible, but they feel somebody must be Christ, so the pseudo-elites have taken up the role! And they dream of a world where the lamb will chew stones beside the wolf, the zebra next to the lion and so forth.
Or are there any pious people who find it difficult to keep their religious diet, while other people eat forbidden food?
If everybody is eating pork, veal, shellfish, it is difficult to be part of the western society and abstain from these things. Actually that was what these diets were forced upon the faithful. To keep them separated from the numerous neighbours.