A
dastard idiot wants to prove his virility to himself, thinks
everybody gives a damn about him and acts like many animals in one
when he sees a female with shorts on the streets. Of course she is
annoyed, she sends him to hell, the dastard proves his idiocy by
throwing an ashtray to her and after missing his target, he follows
her and slaps her.
Every
newspaper and magazine wrote about it and a week latter everything
was forgotten.
Everybody
blamed men as a whole, because they cannot take no for an answer. A
female journalist wrote the following in 'The Guardian': “But
ultimately it comes down to men treating women with respect and
regarding them as equals with agency over their bodies. Unfortunately
this sort of sea change can take generations, especially when it is
undermined by the surrounding visual culture.”
The
Guardian, the Spiegel and other supposed progressive magazines and
newspapers wish for a general reintroduction of the Victorian
fashion. It will take generations, according to them, for men to have
agency over their minds and desires and not act like idiots when they
come across a good-looking woman.
The
elites of Europe don't like the freedom of choice, so they do what
they can to undermine it. Christianity doesn't like love at first
sight and neither does Marxism, those two being the two promoted
ideologies. Christianity has lost its spirituality, however the
Christian way of thinking is the dominant one and it is not very
different from the Marxist one.
Lifestyle
magazines are also guilty. Politicians and industrialists due to
their incompetence to understand that they need well – payed work
force, try to boost the economy by promoting mass consumption. Even
if many do not read such magazines, there are enough who do and they
form a common opinion about these matter, wheareas non-readers have
many different and are not sure of them. So as readers are more
convinced, they are convincing others especially if they pretend this
knowledge comes from their own experiences.
These
lifestyle magazines promote a lifestyle of tycoons. The idea is that
if everybody tries to become a tycoon, that is good for the economy.
They will try their best to become rich and by that many will become
rich. However many will try the criminal way and that either doesn't
bother them or they think it is not so bad.
So
especially by conservative families one gives up trying to find a
partner and the young people wait for their mums, not dads, to find a
'nice bride' for each for her sons. Men make less fuss marrying a
woman they don't like, because they think they can cheat easier than
the women. They aren't supposed to be romantic, while women are. Men
have the money so, when they come to it later they can use it to buy
some extramarital sex.
So
actually what such kind of idiots do is trying to vindicate women as
though they are responsible for their bad manners and lack of
education. They accuse women for not being princesses that will kiss
them and turn them from frogs to princes. Of course they have to show
how virile they are, the lack of which is a constant accussation, and
this is made so they will marry the proposed bride without
objections.
I
read somewhere about the groups of idiots hanging around, shouting
nonsence and feeling safe, because of their numbers. They are
shouting to women or couples passing by, about multiple partners. It
is sure that if ever some people would come to the idea to test them
and send bait women, as long as there is adequate protection, and the
bait women would agree to a 'party', these tough guys would get the
shivers. They would become aggressive and moral all of a sudden, in
order to distract from their self-defined lack of virility.
In
conservative communities women are not to discuss bed secrets with
people outside their circle. So if the man needs homosexual 'help'
from his best man and the latters best man and his best man as well
in order to impregnate his wife, no one outside will hear about it.
